Who is this book for?
- This book would likely appeal to conservative-leaning readers, particularly those concerned about traditional military values and national security.
- Veterans and active-duty military personnel who share the author's views on military culture and readiness would find it resonant.
- Individuals critical of recent social and political changes in the military, as well as those interested in a provocative critique of current defense policies, would be drawn to this book.
- Fans of Fox News and Pete Hegseth's media appearances would also be inclined to appreciate his perspective in this work.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Readers with liberal or progressive political views would likely find this book challenging and potentially offensive.
- Those who support diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in the military or society at large would probably disagree with many of the author's arguments.
- Feminists and advocates for women's expanded roles in the military would likely take issue with the book's stance on women in combat.
- Additionally, individuals seeking a balanced or academic analysis of military issues might be disappointed by the perceived bias and lack of nuance in the author's approach.
- Those who prefer less politically charged discussions of military affairs would also likely find the book's tone off-putting.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Provides a candid, first-hand account of the current state of the U.S. military
- Offers insights into how 'wokeness' has affected military readiness
- Highlights concerns about the military's shift away from meritocracy
- Discusses controversial issues like women in combat roles and DEI initiatives
- Combines the author's military experience with analysis of current policies
- Raises awareness about potential threats to national security
- Suggests solutions to perceived problems in the defense establishment
- Provides historical context by comparing current military culture to past eras
- Addresses the impact of political decisions on military effectiveness
- Sparks discussion about the role and expectations of the armed forces
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Perceived as overly biased and politically charged
- Accused of misogyny, particularly in discussions about women in combat
- Repetitive content, with similar points made throughout the book
- Some readers find the tone too alarmist or extreme
- Lacks nuance in addressing complex issues
- Potentially alienating to readers who disagree with the author's perspective
- Some claims may not be fully substantiated or may be based on limited experience
- Criticized for oversimplifying military and social issues
- May not adequately represent diverse viewpoints within the military
- Some readers find the writing style tiring or preachy
