Who is this book for?
- This book would likely appeal to readers interested in American political history, presidential decision-making, and behind-the-scenes accounts of major historical events.
- Those fascinated by the inner workings of the White House, national security processes, and crisis management would find it engaging.
- History buffs, political science students, and individuals curious about how different presidents handled high-pressure situations would appreciate the insights provided.
- The book might also attract fans of George Stephanopoulos or those who enjoy insider perspectives on government operations.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Readers seeking a strictly academic or heavily footnoted historical text might be disappointed by the lack of rigorous citations.
- Those with strong partisan views, particularly supporters of presidents portrayed negatively (like Nixon or Trump), may find the book's perspective frustrating.
- Individuals looking for in-depth analysis of specific crises rather than a broad overview might find it too superficial.
- People who dislike political commentary or prefer purely factual accounts without authorial interpretation may be put off by Stephanopoulos's occasional editorializing.
- Lastly, readers expecting equal coverage of all administrations or hoping for extensive new revelations about recent presidencies might be dissatisfied.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Provides fascinating insights into presidential crisis management
- Offers a behind-the-scenes look at historical events
- Includes interesting anecdotes and little-known facts
- Covers a wide range of presidential administrations from Kennedy to Biden
- Explains the evolution and importance of the Situation Room
- Highlights the dedication of public servants involved in crisis management
- Well-researched with interviews from over 100 people
- Audiobook version includes actual voice recordings and interviews
- Balanced treatment of most administrations
- Informative about decision-making processes during national crises
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Some readers found political bias, especially in coverage of recent administrations
- Lacks proper citations and footnotes for academic rigor
- Can be overly broad and lacking in depth on some topics
- Drags on in certain sections
- Limited coverage of some administrations (e.g., Clinton years)
- Author sometimes inserts himself unnecessarily into the narrative
- Some readers found the audiobook narration style irritating
- May not offer much new information for those already well-versed in White House history
- Occasional repetitiveness in storytelling
- Some readers felt it was too politically slanted
