The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine

by

Rashid Khalidi

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • This book would likely appeal to readers sympathetic to the Palestinian cause or seeking to understand the Palestinian perspective on the conflict.
  • Those critical of Israel's policies and actions would find validation for their views.
  • Readers interested in postcolonial narratives and critiques of Western imperialism would appreciate the framing.
  • Students and scholars of Middle East history and politics looking for an alternative to mainstream Western accounts would find value in the historical details and analysis from a Palestinian point of view.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Readers who are strongly pro-Israel or Zionist would likely take issue with the book's framing and conclusions.
  • Those seeking an objective or balanced account of the conflict would be frustrated by the one-sided narrative and omissions.
  • Readers sensitive to antisemitic tropes or conspiracy theories about Jewish/Zionist power and influence would be put off by some of the language and arguments.
  • Historians and academics expecting a strictly scholarly approach with equal consideration of multiple perspectives would find the personal nature and clear bias of the account problematic.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides a Palestinian perspective on the conflict, which is often underrepresented
  • Offers a comprehensive historical overview spanning 100 years
  • Draws on personal family history and experiences to humanize the narrative
  • Challenges dominant narratives and interpretations of the conflict
  • Highlights key episodes and turning points in the colonial campaign against Palestinians
  • Critically examines the role of major powers like Britain and the US in supporting Israel
  • Analyzes the failures of Palestinian leadership and Arab states in supporting the cause
  • Provides insight into diplomatic negotiations and peace processes from a Palestinian view
  • Includes extensive footnotes and references to primary sources
  • Offers a nuanced view that acknowledges mistakes on the Palestinian side as well

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Presents a one-sided narrative that omits or downplays key events unfavorable to Palestinians
  • Uses charged language and framing that some may see as biased or propagandistic
  • Lacks empathy or acknowledgment of Israeli/Jewish perspectives and suffering
  • Relies heavily on personal anecdotes rather than a strictly academic approach
  • Promotes conspiracy theories about Israeli/Zionist influence and control
  • Glosses over or justifies Palestinian violence and terrorism
  • Rejects two-state solution in favor of more extreme position
  • Uses antisemitic tropes and language at times
  • Presents a victimhood narrative that some feel absolves Palestinians of responsibility
  • Omits key historical context like the expulsion of Jews from Arab countries

If you like this book, you should consider reading:

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed