Who is this book for?
- Readers who would likely enjoy this book include fans of Salman Rushdie's previous works, those interested in personal accounts of survival and resilience, and individuals curious about the impact of the fatwa on Rushdie's life.
- Literary enthusiasts who appreciate reflections on writing and the role of art in society would find value in Rushdie's musings.
- Those interested in medical memoirs or accounts of physical rehabilitation might also appreciate the detailed descriptions of his recovery process.
- Additionally, readers who enjoy insider glimpses into the literary world and anecdotes about famous authors and cultural figures would likely find the book engaging.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Readers who might not enjoy this book include those who prefer more structured or traditionally formatted memoirs, as some found Rushdie's style disjointed or rambling.
- Individuals seeking deep philosophical insights or profound revelations about trauma and recovery might be disappointed by what some perceived as a surface-level treatment of these themes.
- Those who are sensitive to displays of privilege or extensive name-dropping may find parts of the book off-putting.
- Readers looking for an objective account of the attack and its aftermath might be frustrated by Rushdie's subjective and sometimes political commentary.
- Additionally, those who prefer memoirs that maintain a consistent emotional tone throughout may struggle with what some perceived as emotional detachment in parts of the narrative.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Provides a lucid, personal account of surviving a brutal attack
- Offers insights into the author's resilience and determination to recover
- Contains thoughtful reflections on art, literature, and freedom of expression
- Highlights the importance of family and friends in the recovery process
- Demonstrates the author's wit and sense of humor despite trauma
- Explores themes of survival, healing, and reclaiming one's life
- Offers a unique perspective on living under the threat of violence for decades
- Provides intimate details of the medical procedures and rehabilitation process
- Contains poignant tributes to the author's wife and support system
- Includes interesting anecdotes about the author's literary life and connections
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Some readers found parts of the book self-indulgent or egotistical
- The imagined conversation with the attacker was divisive, with some finding it unnecessary
- Some felt the book lacked depth or profound insights about the experience
- The writing style was described as disjointed or unfocused by some readers
- Some found the medical details and recovery process descriptions tedious
- A few readers felt the book was published too soon after the event
- Some criticized the author's political views and commentary as biased
- The amount of name-dropping and descriptions of privilege put off some readers
- A few found the book emotionally detached or lacking in vulnerability
- Some felt the book didn't offer enough new information or perspective on the attack
