Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know

by

Adam M. Grant

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Think Again would likely appeal to readers interested in personal development, psychology, and improving their critical thinking skills.
  • It's well-suited for professionals, leaders, and anyone looking to enhance their decision-making abilities or become more open-minded.
  • Those who enjoy popular psychology books with a mix of research and anecdotes will find the writing style engaging.
  • Individuals who struggle with changing their minds or want to improve their persuasion skills may find the book's strategies particularly useful.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Readers who are already well-versed in cognitive psychology, critical thinking, or have read extensively on similar topics may find the content repetitive or lacking in new insights.
  • Those who prefer more academic or in-depth treatments of psychological concepts might find the book too simplistic or anecdote-heavy.
  • Individuals looking for a quick, concise read may be put off by the book's length and repetition of key ideas.
  • Critics of mainstream self-help literature or those skeptical of pop psychology might also be less receptive to the book's approach and conclusions.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Encourages intellectual humility and openness to changing one's mind
  • Provides strategies for more effective communication and persuasion
  • Offers insights on how to have more productive disagreements
  • Highlights the importance of questioning assumptions and seeking disconfirming evidence
  • Includes interesting real-world examples and case studies
  • Promotes a scientific mindset of curiosity and continuous learning
  • Discusses techniques for overcoming cognitive biases
  • Emphasizes the value of intellectual flexibility and adaptability
  • Explores ways to create learning cultures in organizations
  • Provides actionable advice for rethinking approaches to work and life

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Some readers found the content repetitive or lacking in novel insights
  • Writing style can come across as self-congratulatory to some
  • Relies heavily on anecdotes and post-hoc reasoning in places
  • Oversimplifies complex issues at times
  • Some arguments and studies cited are seen as flawed by critics
  • Can feel preachy or obvious to readers already familiar with the concepts
  • Doesn't adequately address how to deal with bad faith actors
  • Some found the book's central message could have been conveyed more concisely
  • Occasionally contradicts its own advice about complexity
  • Perspective may be biased towards privileged viewpoints

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed