Who is this book for?
- This book would likely appeal to readers with an interest in law, constitutional interpretation, and the workings of the Supreme Court.
- It would be particularly engaging for those who are curious about different approaches to judicial decision-making and the debate between textualism and more pragmatic interpretations of the Constitution.
- Law students, political science majors, and individuals concerned about recent Supreme Court decisions would find value in Justice Breyer's insights.
- Those who appreciate a liberal or moderate perspective on constitutional law would also likely enjoy this book.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Readers who prefer light, casual reading or those without a strong interest in legal or political topics may find this book challenging or unengaging.
- Individuals who strongly favor textualist or originalist interpretations of the Constitution might be frustrated by Justice Breyer's arguments against these approaches.
- Those looking for a quick, easy-to-digest overview of constitutional law may be overwhelmed by the book's depth and technical detail.
- Additionally, readers who are seeking a more conservative perspective on Supreme Court decisions or those who dislike academic or dense writing styles might not enjoy this book.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Provides an excellent explanation of different methods for interpreting the Constitution
- Offers a compelling critique of textualism and originalism
- Written by a highly experienced former Supreme Court Justice
- Accessible to readers without a legal background
- Uses specific case examples to illustrate different interpretative approaches
- Offers insights into the Supreme Court's decision-making process
- Demonstrates the author's deep knowledge and experience in constitutional law
- Promotes a pragmatic, purpose-oriented approach to constitutional interpretation
- Discusses important historical context for constitutional interpretation
- Addresses current issues and recent controversial Supreme Court decisions
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Contains a lot of legal jargon that may be difficult for some readers
- Can be dense and technical in places, requiring careful reading
- Some readers may find the writing style dry or academic
- May be too detailed or in-depth for casual readers
- Some reviewers found the book repetitive in its structure
- The author's liberal perspective may not appeal to all readers
- Some readers found the book's pacing uneven
- May be frustrating for those who disagree with the author's judicial philosophy
- The book's arguments may seem outdated given recent Supreme Court decisions
- Some readers felt the book was too optimistic about compromise in the current political climate
