Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI

by

Yuval Noah Harari

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Readers interested in big-picture views of human history and technological development.
  • Those curious about the societal impacts of AI and information technology.
  • Fans of Harari's previous works like Sapiens and Homo Deus.
  • People who enjoy thought-provoking non-fiction that spans multiple disciplines.
  • Individuals concerned about the future of democracy and information in the digital age.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Readers seeking in-depth technical analysis of information theory or AI technology.
  • Those looking for concrete solutions to the challenges posed by AI and information networks.
  • People who prefer more narrowly focused historical or technological studies.
  • Readers who are already well-versed in the topics of information networks and AI impacts.
  • Those who dislike speculative or alarmist writing about technology and society.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides a comprehensive overview of how information networks have shaped human history
  • Offers thought-provoking insights on the potential impacts of AI on society
  • Well-researched content presented in an accessible way
  • Explores complex ideas about information, truth, and social order
  • Draws interesting parallels between historical information revolutions and modern technology
  • Raises important questions about AI governance and ethics
  • Entertaining historical anecdotes and examples
  • Examines how different political systems handle information flow
  • Discusses the economic implications of information as a form of currency
  • Highlights the need for robust self-correcting mechanisms in information networks

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Lacks depth in technical discussions of information theory and AI
  • Rehashes some material from author's previous books
  • Can be overly simplistic or reductive in its historical analysis
  • Some readers find the tone pessimistic or alarmist about AI
  • Lacks concrete solutions to the problems it raises
  • Writing can be repetitive and belabor points
  • Shows potential bias in political and economic analysis
  • Fails to fully explore the political and economic contexts of information networks
  • Some arguments and predictions feel speculative or poorly supported
  • Structure feels disjointed, shifting focus from information networks to AI

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed