Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty

by

Daron Acemoğlu, James A. Robinson

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Readers interested in big-picture theories of economic development and world history.
  • Students and scholars of political economy, international relations, and development studies.
  • People looking for an accessible introduction to institutional economics.
  • Those who enjoy sweeping historical narratives that connect past events to current issues.
  • Readers who like challenging conventional wisdom about why some countries are rich and others poor.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Academics and experts looking for rigorous statistical analysis or highly technical economic theory.
  • Readers who prefer more nuanced, multi-causal explanations for complex historical phenomena.
  • Those who are critical of Western-centric or neoliberal economic perspectives.
  • People who get frustrated by repetitive arguments or overly simplistic explanations.
  • Readers looking for practical policy solutions rather than broad theoretical frameworks.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides an insightful theory on why some nations prosper while others fail
  • Offers a wealth of historical examples and case studies to support the main arguments
  • Challenges common theories about national success/failure like geography and culture
  • Introduces key concepts like 'extractive' vs 'inclusive' institutions
  • Explains complex economic and political ideas in an accessible way
  • Covers a broad sweep of world history and different regions/countries
  • Thought-provoking analysis of how political and economic institutions shape national outcomes
  • Highlights the importance of innovation and 'creative destruction' for economic growth
  • Provides a framework for understanding inequality between and within nations
  • Draws interesting connections between historical events and modern economic/political situations

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Overly simplistic explanation for complex historical and economic phenomena
  • Ignores or downplays other important factors like geography, culture, external influences
  • Repetitive arguments and examples throughout the book
  • Selective use of historical examples to fit the theory
  • Lack of rigorous data analysis or statistical evidence to support claims
  • Fails to adequately explain how extractive institutions arise in the first place
  • Overlooks nuances and complexities in the historical case studies presented
  • Presents a somewhat Eurocentric/Western-centric view of development
  • Does not offer clear solutions for how to change extractive institutions
  • Some predictions and analyses have not held up well since publication

If you like this book, you should consider reading:

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed