Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House

by

Jonathan Allen, Amie Parnes

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Political junkies who enjoy insider accounts of campaigns.
  • Readers interested in understanding the behind-the-scenes machinations of the 2024 election.
  • Those who want to know more about how the Biden to Harris transition unfolded.
  • People fascinated by the personalities and conflicts within political parties.
  • Readers who enjoy fast-paced, dramatic non-fiction about current events.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Those looking for in-depth policy analysis or historical context.
  • Readers sensitive to profanity or gossipy content in political books.
  • People who prefer more academic or scholarly approaches to political analysis.
  • Strong partisans who may be upset by criticism of their preferred candidates.
  • Readers who closely followed the 2024 election and are looking for completely new information.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides a detailed, behind-the-scenes look at the 2024 presidential campaign
  • Well-researched with interviews from over 150 insiders across campaigns
  • Offers insights into the decision-making and strategies of the Biden, Harris, and Trump camps
  • Written in an engaging, fast-paced style that makes it a compelling read
  • Gives a balanced perspective on both Democratic and Republican sides
  • Reveals the internal conflicts and power struggles within the Democratic party
  • Analyzes why Trump was able to win and why Harris ultimately lost
  • Captures the high stakes and dramatic moments of the campaign
  • Provides context on key events like Biden dropping out and Harris taking over
  • Offers a fly-on-the-wall view of how campaigns operate behind closed doors

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Some readers felt it was biased against Biden in its portrayal
  • Lacks an index which makes it hard to reference specific information
  • Contains a lot of profanity which some readers found unnecessary
  • Doesn't provide much new information for those who closely followed the election
  • Rushed to publication which led to some disorganization and confusion
  • Relies heavily on unnamed sources and speculation about people's thoughts
  • Focuses more on gossip and drama than substantive policy analysis
  • Glosses over some key issues like racism and sexism in the election
  • Portrays Trump more positively than some readers felt was warranted
  • Doesn't provide much historical context or comparison to past elections

If you like this book, you should consider reading:

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed