Cultish: The Language of Fanaticism

by

Amanda Montell

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Readers interested in pop psychology and social science who enjoy accessible nonfiction.
  • People curious about cults and extremist groups who want an entry-level overview.
  • Those concerned about manipulative tactics in modern society and looking to recognize warning signs.
  • Individuals interested in the power of language and how it shapes beliefs and behavior.
  • Readers who enjoy books that analyze everyday phenomena through a critical lens.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Academics or experts in linguistics or cult studies seeking rigorous, in-depth analysis.
  • Readers looking for a focused, scholarly examination of cult language specifically.
  • Those who prefer nonfiction without personal anecdotes or author opinions.
  • People already well-versed in cult psychology who may find the information repetitive.
  • Readers sensitive to broad generalizations about groups or practices being labeled as 'cultish'.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides insight into how language is used to influence and manipulate people in cult-like groups
  • Examines a wide range of groups beyond traditional cults, including modern phenomena like SoulCycle and MLMs
  • Accessible and engaging writing style that makes complex topics easy to understand
  • Offers tools to recognize manipulative language and cultish tactics in everyday life
  • Explores the psychology of why people are drawn to cult-like groups
  • Analyzes how social media and modern technology enable cult-like behavior
  • Provides historical context on well-known cults like Jonestown and Heaven's Gate
  • Discusses the power of community and belonging that cults tap into
  • Highlights how seemingly benign groups can use cult-like language and tactics
  • Encourages critical thinking about the language used by various groups and leaders

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Some readers found it superficial and lacking in-depth analysis
  • Focuses more on describing cults than analyzing their specific language use
  • Can be repetitive at times, rehashing well-known information about famous cults
  • Author's personal anecdotes and opinions sometimes overshadow the research
  • Broad definition of 'cultish' behavior may overreach in some examples
  • Lacks substantial academic rigor despite author presenting herself as a 'language scholar'
  • Some factual errors noted in historical accounts
  • Uneven coverage, with some relevant cult-like groups (e.g. male-dominated ones) omitted
  • Writing style can be chaotic and disorganized at times
  • May not offer much new information for those already familiar with cult studies

If you like this book, you should consider reading:

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed