Who is this book for?
- Individuals new to the topic of UFOs and government investigations into the phenomenon.
- Readers interested in insider accounts of government operations and bureaucracy.
- Those fascinated by conspiracy theories and government secrecy.
- People who enjoy memoirs and personal accounts of high-stakes situations.
- Individuals curious about recent developments in UFO disclosure and government acknowledgment of the phenomenon.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Seasoned UFO researchers looking for groundbreaking new information.
- Skeptics who require hard evidence and scientific proof for extraordinary claims.
- Readers who prefer strictly factual accounts without personal anecdotes or speculation.
- Those who are sensitive to discussions of controversial topics like remote viewing or alien implants.
- Individuals who are critical of government intelligence operations and may find the author's background problematic.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Provides insider knowledge from a credible source with verifiable credentials
- Offers insights into government workings and UFO investigations
- Presents a concise summary of crucial aspects of the UFO phenomenon
- Reveals previously unknown case studies and incidents
- Demonstrates the author's efforts to open up the topic to public awareness
- Explains the complex recent history of UFO investigating bodies within the Pentagon
- Discusses potential theories on how UAPs might operate
- Highlights the importance of government transparency on the UFO topic
- Provides a historical account of recent developments in UFO disclosure
- Offers easily understandable explanations of scientific concepts related to UAPs
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Contains little new information for those already well-versed in UFO topics
- Includes controversial beliefs like remote viewing and Morgellons disease
- Writing style can be disjointed and repetitive at times
- Lacks substantial new evidence to support claims
- Relies heavily on the author's personal credibility rather than concrete proof
- Includes unnecessary personal anecdotes and family details
- Contains redacted information that may frustrate readers
- Portrays people in an overly simplistic, black-and-white manner
- Glosses over the author's controversial past, including work at Guantanamo Bay
- Some claims and theories presented lack scientific backing or evidence
