Who is this book for?
- This book would likely appeal to conservative readers who enjoy Jesse Watters' work on Fox News and are interested in understanding extreme left-wing viewpoints.
- It may also attract readers fascinated by fringe elements of society, psychology enthusiasts curious about how personal trauma shapes political beliefs, and those who enjoy provocative, non-traditional interviews.
- People who are skeptical of liberal ideologies and want to explore critiques of far-left thinking would find this book engaging.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Readers with strong liberal leanings or those sensitive to potential ridicule of vulnerable individuals would likely dislike this book.
- It may also be off-putting to people who prefer more balanced political commentary or those uncomfortable with extreme viewpoints.
- Individuals seeking uplifting or positive content might find the book too depressing or disturbing.
- Additionally, readers who value academic rigor or unbiased reporting in political analysis may be dissatisfied with the author's approach and conclusions.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Provides insight into the perspectives of people with extreme views on the far left
- Interviews are conducted with respect, compassion, and empathy
- Reveals how childhood trauma often shapes extreme political views
- Offers a unique look at fringe elements of society
- Presents a diverse range of unconventional viewpoints
- Highlights the author's ability to get people to open up about their beliefs
- Demonstrates the author's depth and intelligence in handling complex subjects
- Gives voice to perspectives not often heard in mainstream media
- Offers a glimpse into the thought processes of extreme leftists
- Provides an eye-opening experience about the state of fringe society
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Can be depressing and sad to read about troubled individuals
- Some readers find the author's tone mocking or ridiculing towards interviewees
- Difficult to read due to the extreme nature of some viewpoints presented
- Lacks balance by not including radical right-wing perspectives
- Writing style can be tedious and dense at times
- Some readers find it hard to distinguish between the author's voice and interviewees
- May be seen as punching down or exploiting vulnerable individuals
- Potentially reinforces negative stereotypes about liberals
- Some interviewees may need mental health support rather than a platform
- Can be disturbing or upsetting, especially regarding sensitive topics like pedophilia
