Who is this book for?
- Readers who enjoy fast-paced, action-packed thrillers with elements of natural disasters and science fiction would likely enjoy this book.
- Fans of disaster movies, volcano enthusiasts, and those who appreciate high-stakes plots with global consequences would find it appealing.
- People who are more interested in plot and excitement rather than deep character development or literary prose would be satisfied.
- Additionally, readers who are curious about the collaboration between Crichton and Patterson or who enjoy bestselling mainstream thrillers would be drawn to this book.
Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?
- Readers who are looking for the depth, complexity, and scientific rigor typical of Michael Crichton's solo works may be disappointed by this book.
- Literary fiction enthusiasts who value nuanced character development, sophisticated writing, and realistic dialogue would likely find it lacking.
- Critics of James Patterson's writing style or those who dislike collaborative works that attempt to mimic a deceased author's voice might be put off.
- Additionally, readers who are sensitive to plot holes, scientific inaccuracies, or overly convenient resolutions in thrillers would probably not enjoy this book.
Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book
- Exciting and fast-paced story that keeps readers on the edge of their seats
- Well-researched and detailed information about volcanoes and geology
- Combines natural disaster elements with military secrets for added intrigue
- Likable and relatable main characters
- Vivid descriptions that make the volcanic eruption feel realistic
- Blends the writing styles of both Crichton and Patterson
- Includes elements of humor amidst the tension
- Explores interesting scientific concepts and scenarios
- Cinematic quality that makes it easy to visualize as a movie
- Engaging plot with high stakes and global consequences
Things people didn't like as much about this book
- Writing style is inconsistent and often simplistic compared to Crichton's usual work
- Characters can be two-dimensional or cartoonish at times
- Plot relies on a chain of unlikely events that strain credibility
- Dialogue is often cliché-ridden and unrealistic
- Ending feels anticlimactic to some readers
- Use of Hawaiian phrases feels inauthentic and forced
- Some scientific explanations and solutions seem implausible
- Overuse of cliffhangers and repetitive tension-building techniques
- Lacks the depth and complexity of Crichton's solo works
- Some readers feel it doesn't live up to the hype or expectations set by the authors' reputations
