Revenge of the Tipping Point: Overstories, Superspreaders, and the Rise of Social Engineering

by

Malcolm Gladwell

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Fans of Malcolm Gladwell's previous works and writing style.
  • Readers interested in social psychology, behavioral economics, and cultural trends.
  • People who enjoy thought-provoking non-fiction that challenges conventional wisdom.
  • Those fascinated by the mechanisms behind social epidemics and cultural shifts.
  • Individuals looking for new perspectives on current events and societal issues.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Readers seeking purely academic or rigorous scientific analysis.
  • Those who prefer straightforward narratives without interweaving stories.
  • People who are skeptical of broad generalizations based on anecdotal evidence.
  • Individuals who have extensively studied the topics covered and may find the treatment superficial.
  • Readers who dislike when authors draw strong conclusions from limited or cherry-picked data.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Engaging storytelling that makes complex topics accessible and interesting
  • Thought-provoking analysis of social phenomena and tipping points
  • Explores relevant contemporary issues like the opioid crisis and COVID-19
  • Introduces intriguing concepts like 'overstories' and the 'Magic Third'
  • Provides fresh perspectives on familiar topics
  • Well-produced audiobook with interviews and audio clips
  • Challenges assumptions and offers new ways of looking at social dynamics
  • Synthesizes diverse ideas and research into cohesive narratives
  • Offers a framework for understanding social epidemics and contagious phenomena
  • Builds upon and evolves ideas from Gladwell's earlier work

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Some readers may find it repetitive or derivative of earlier work
  • Anecdotes sometimes feel oversimplified or too neatly packaged
  • Leaps between topics can be jarring or confusing
  • Some examples and case studies feel dated or lacking in recent context
  • Conclusions drawn from examples may not always be convincing
  • Narrative structure can be fragmented and hard to follow at times
  • Some stories don't fit neatly into the overall framework
  • May come across as preachy or condescending to some readers
  • Potential omission of important facts that don't fit the narrative
  • Criticisms of specific groups (e.g., Harvard women's rugby team) may be seen as unfair or poorly researched

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed