Framed: Astonishing True Stories of Wrongful Convictions

by

John Grisham, Jim McCloskey

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • True crime enthusiasts interested in wrongful convictions and judicial errors.
  • Readers passionate about social justice and criminal justice reform.
  • Fans of John Grisham's non-fiction work like 'The Innocent Man'.
  • Law students and professionals interested in real-world case studies of legal misconduct.
  • Those interested in the workings of organizations like the Innocence Project and Centurion Ministries.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Readers who prefer lighter, less emotionally taxing material.
  • Those who struggle with detailed, complex narratives involving multiple characters and events.
  • People who are easily frustrated by accounts of systemic injustice and corruption.
  • Readers looking for more current cases and examples of wrongful convictions.
  • Those who prefer Grisham's fictional legal thrillers over his non-fiction work.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Sheds light on the injustices in the criminal justice system
  • Well-researched and grippingly told stories of wrongful convictions
  • Provides an inside look at the flaws in the legal system
  • Highlights the importance of DNA evidence in exonerating the innocent
  • Raises awareness about the need for reform in the justice system
  • Offers compelling true crime narratives with dramatic twists
  • Showcases the perseverance and faith of wrongfully convicted individuals
  • Exposes corruption and misconduct in law enforcement and prosecution
  • Demonstrates the power of organizations like Centurion Ministries in freeing the innocent
  • Written by respected authors John Grisham and Jim McCloskey

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Can be emotionally difficult and frustrating to read
  • Some readers found the writing repetitive and hard to follow at times
  • May be too depressing or upsetting for some readers
  • Focuses mostly on older cases from decades ago
  • Some felt the storytelling was inconsistent between the two authors
  • Can be overwhelming with numerous details and characters in each case
  • May feel biased against law enforcement and the legal system
  • Some readers found it less engaging than Grisham's fiction works
  • Might be too long or detailed for casual true crime readers
  • Could be seen as sensationalistic by some readers

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed