On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century

by

Timothy Snyder

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • People concerned about the rise of populism and erosion of democratic norms.
  • Readers interested in learning from 20th century history to understand current politics.
  • Those looking for concrete ways to be politically engaged and defend democracy.
  • Liberal and left-leaning individuals critical of the Trump administration.
  • Students and educators seeking an accessible introduction to resisting authoritarianism.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Conservatives who view the book as partisan fear-mongering.
  • Readers looking for a more in-depth historical or political analysis.
  • Those who believe comparisons between current US politics and fascism are overblown.
  • People outside the US who may find the American focus less relevant.
  • Readers seeking a more balanced or non-partisan perspective on contemporary politics.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides practical advice on how to recognize and resist authoritarianism
  • Draws insightful parallels between historical fascist regimes and current political trends
  • Concise and accessible format with 20 clear lessons
  • Encourages civic engagement and defense of democratic institutions
  • Emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and seeking truth
  • Promotes reading books and engaging with quality journalism
  • Highlights the value of personal ethics and professional integrity
  • Advocates for building community connections and solidarity
  • Warns against complacency and normalization of extremism
  • Offers a framework for understanding threats to democracy

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Some view it as alarmist or overreacting to the Trump presidency
  • Heavily focused on American politics, limiting global relevance
  • Draws primarily on Nazi/Soviet examples, potentially oversimplifying modern authoritarianism
  • Brief format doesn't allow for in-depth historical analysis
  • Some advice seen as obvious or simplistic (e.g. "read books")
  • Perceived liberal bias alienates some conservative readers
  • Lack of nuance in comparing current events to historical fascism
  • Omits discussion of left-wing authoritarianism
  • Does not directly name Trump, seen as overly cautious by some
  • Reading list recommendations criticized as too white and male-centric

If you like this book, you should consider reading:

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed