Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes

by

Leah Litman

Should you read this book?

The best public reviews summarized for you.

Who is this book for?

  • Readers who are concerned about the current direction of the Supreme Court and want a deeper understanding of recent decisions.
  • Fans of the Strict Scrutiny podcast or other legal commentary shows who enjoy a mix of analysis and humor.
  • Liberal or left-leaning individuals looking for a critique of conservative judicial philosophy.
  • People interested in the intersection of law, politics, and pop culture.
  • Those who want to understand complex legal concepts but are intimidated by traditional legal writing.

Who is unlikely to appreciate this book?

  • Conservative readers or those who support the current Supreme Court's decisions.
  • Readers looking for a strictly academic or non-partisan analysis of the Supreme Court.
  • Those who prefer their legal commentary without pop culture references or attempts at humor.
  • People who already have extensive knowledge of Supreme Court cases and are seeking new insights.
  • Readers who are easily frustrated by non-linear or conversational writing styles in non-fiction works.

Things online reviewers enjoyed about this book

  • Provides a comprehensive critique of the current Supreme Court's decisions and practices
  • Uses pop culture references to make complex legal concepts more accessible
  • Well-researched with numerous sources and direct quotes
  • Offers historical context for how the Court reached its current state
  • Breaks down difficult legal language for non-lawyers
  • Presents a compelling argument about the Court's 'lawlessness'
  • Ends with a call to action for civic engagement and voting
  • Brings humor and wit to a serious topic
  • Covers important issues like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and voting rights
  • Written by a knowledgeable Constitutional law professor and podcast host

Things people didn't like as much about this book

  • Heavy use of pop culture references may be distracting or off-putting for some readers
  • Sarcastic tone and attempts at humor may undermine the seriousness of the subject for some
  • Can be dense and difficult to follow for those without a legal background
  • Shows a clear left-leaning bias that may alienate conservative readers
  • Organization of content can feel scattered or repetitive at times
  • Overuse of the term 'vibes' may seem unprofessional to some readers
  • May not offer enough new information for those already well-versed in Supreme Court issues
  • Some readers found the writing style and structure challenging to follow
  • Lacks substantial discussion of potential solutions or reforms
  • May not be persuasive to those who don't already agree with the author's viewpoint

If you like this book, you should consider reading:

About

Privacy Policy

RSS Feed